Insurance Exam Drill: What a Credit Rating Upgrade Means — Michigan Millers Case

Hook: Turn a real AM Best upgrade into exam-winning practice

Struggling to find high-quality, realistic practice material for insurance licensing? You’re not alone. Many candidates can recite definitions but stumble when a live industry event—like AM Best’s January 16, 2026 upgrade of Michigan Millers—shows up on an exam in the form of a case study. This drill converts that exact announcement into timed, scored practice question sets that test credit rating interpretation, solvency reasoning, and insurer financial-strength analysis.

Why the Michigan Millers upgrade is a perfect licensing drill (most important first)

AM Best upgraded Michigan Millers’ Financial Strength Rating (FSR) to A+ (Superior) and the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating (ICR) to aa- (Superior) on Jan. 16, 2026, and revised the outlook to stable. The upgrade followed Michigan Millers joining the Western National pooling arrangement and assignment of a "p" reinsurance affiliation code. For exam candidates, that short announcement touches multiple exam domains: balance-sheet assessment, reinsurance and pooling effects, rating methodology, and solvency indicators.

What to master here (quick checklist)

• FSR vs. ICR: Financial Strength Rating focuses on insurer’s ability to meet policyholder obligations; Issuer Credit Rating reflects creditworthiness of the entity.
• Balance-sheet strength: statutory surplus, liquidity, investment quality.
• Operating performance: combined ratio, underwriting results, earned premium trends.
• Enterprise risk management (ERM): capital management, stress testing, scenario planning.
• Reinsurance affiliation code "p": indicates participation in a pooling arrangement that materially affects risk transfer and capital support.
• Regulatory & rating implications: how pool membership, strong reinsurance support, and capital adequacy affect ratings.

Practice Drill: Timed question sets using the Michigan Millers scenario

All sets below are built for licensing-style practice. Use a stopwatch and follow the time limits. After each question you’ll find an evidence-based explanation so you learn while you test.

Quick Drill — 5 MCQs (15 minutes)

Scenario summary (use for all questions in this set): AM Best upgrades Michigan Millers to A+ FSR and aa- ICR after Michigan Millers joins Western National’s pooling agreement; ratings outlook revised to stable.

1. Q1 (3 min): Which of the following best explains why AM Best might raise an insurer’s Financial Strength Rating after joining a pooled group?

   1. Pooling increases premium volume, which automatically raises ratings.
   2. Pooling provides reinsurance support and capital sharing that strengthens balance-sheet metrics.
   3. AM Best always aligns ratings of small insurers with their new parent regardless of financials.
   4. Pooling removes regulatory oversight which reduces costs.

   Answer: B. Pool participation commonly provides significant reinsurance support, capital support, and diversification benefits that improve balance-sheet strength—key inputs to ratings.

2. Q2 (3 min): The upgrade listed the company’s operating performance as "strong." Which metric would an examiner expect you to cite as supportive evidence?

   1. Combined ratio consistently below 100%
   2. Gross written premium growth above 50% year-over-year
   3. Investment yield above that of the S&P 500
   4. NAIC complaint ratio under 1%

   Answer: A. A combined ratio under 100% indicates underwriting profitability—core to operating performance. Rapid premium growth alone (B) could signal risk; investment yield (C) is secondary; complaint ratio (D) is not a primary ratings driver.

3. Q3 (3 min): AM Best assigned a "p" reinsurance affiliation code. For exam purposes, the "p" code most directly indicates:

   1. Pure-proportional reinsurance usage
   2. Participation in a pooling/reinsurance arrangement with affiliated entities
   3. Protected cell company structure
   4. Parent-owned reinsurer without any risk transfer

   Answer: B. A "p" code denotes a reinsurance affiliation where pooling/participation agreements materially impact risk and capital flows.

4. Q4 (3 min): AM Best revised the outlook from positive to stable after the upgrade. Which is the most accurate exam-style interpretation?

   1. AM Best expects further upgrades within 12 months.
   2. AM Best believes current strengths are sustainable but no further rapid change is expected.
   3. AM Best is signaling impending downgrade risk.
   4. The rating is now permanent and will not change.

   Answer: B. A stable outlook indicates the agency views the rating as likely to remain steady; it does not imply permanence or immediate change.

5. Q5 (3 min): Which candidate action best prepares you to answer exam questions about rating rationales like this one?

   1. Memorize rating letters for all carriers
   2. Practice interpreting rating rationales and linking them to financial statement metrics
   3. Ignore rating reports and focus on insurance law
   4. Only study premium taxation rules

   Answer: B. Licensing exams test your ability to connect narrative rating drivers to quantifiable metrics—practice interpreting rationales is high-leverage study.

Intermediate Drill — 5 MCQs (30 minutes)

Scenario addendum: Western National extends its ratings to Michigan Millers due to significant reinsurance support. Use this to apply deeper solvency and reinsurance principles.

1. Q6 (6 min): If Michigan Millers’ statutory surplus increases because of capital support from Western National, what is the most direct effect on the insurer’s risk-based capital (RBC) ratio?

   1. RBC ratio decreases because liabilities increased.
   2. RBC ratio increases because surplus (numerator) increased.
   3. RBC ratio is unaffected by surplus changes.
   4. RBC ratio becomes irrelevant after a rating upgrade.

   Answer: B. RBC ratio rises when statutory surplus increases, all else equal. RBC measures capital adequacy relative to risk-based required capital.

2. Q7 (6 min): Which statement best describes why AM Best would extend Western National’s ratings to Michigan Millers?

   1. Because Michigan Millers has identical investment portfolios.
   2. Because material reinsurance and capital support make Michigan Millers’ credit profile substantially linked to Western National.
   3. Because Michigan Millers pays a licensing fee to AM Best.
   4. Because Michigan Millers operates in the same state as Western National.

   Answer: B. Ratings extension happens when support and affiliation mean the smaller insurer’s creditworthiness depends significantly on the parent or pool.

3. Q8 (6 min): On an exam, you’re given that Michigan Millers’ combined ratio moved from 95% to 110% year-over-year but the company joined a pool that provided reinsurance covering 60% of retained losses. How should you reconcile the combined ratio change in a ratings analysis?

   1. Ignore combined ratio—reinsurance makes it irrelevant.
   2. Adjust the combined ratio to reflect ceded losses and evaluate operating performance on a net-of-reinsurance basis.
   3. Assume the combined ratio will revert to 95% next year.
   4. Only focus on investment income to offset underwriting loss.

   Answer: B. Reinsurance materially affects net loss experience; analysts should examine net-of-reinsurance combined ratios and the quality/creditworthiness of the reinsurer or pool.

4. Q9 (6 min): Which ERM factor would be most relevant to AM Best when evaluating the decision to revise an outlook to stable after an upgrade?

   1. Board meeting attendance records
   2. Quality and implementation of capital-management plans and stress testing
   3. Marketing budget allocation
   4. Number of new hires in sales

   Answer: B. Capital-management capability and stress testing are central ERM elements that support a sustainable ratings profile; marketing metrics are peripheral.

5. Q10 (6 min): For exam scoring: If you correctly interpret the rating extension mechanics but miss the impact of a "p" code on net exposures, how many points do you likely lose on a multi-part question?

   1. All points; the "p" code is the only scoring element.
   2. Most of the points; mechanisms of reinsurance support are core to financial-strength analysis.
   3. Zero points; the "p" code is trivial.
   4. No partial credit is ever given on licensing exams.

   Answer: B. On multi-part licensing questions, misunderstanding reinsurance affiliation usually costs substantial points because it affects net-risk exposure and capital assessment.

Advanced Drill — Case + calculation (45 minutes)

Use the facts below to answer the calculation and interpretation questions. Time yourself and write out steps; exam graders reward clear method.

Facts: Before pooling, Michigan Millers had statutory surplus of $120 million and an authorized control level (ACL) RBC requirement of $40 million. After joining the pool and receiving capital support, statutory surplus rises to $170 million. Ceded reinsurance reduces net written premium exposure weight, decreasing ACL RBC requirement to $33 million.

1. Q11 (15 min): Calculate the RBC ratio before and after pooling and explain implications.

   Answer method and calculation:

   1. RBC ratio = Statutory surplus / ACL required capital.
   2. Before pooling: 120 / 40 = 3.0 → 300%.
   3. After pooling: 170 / 33 ≈ 5.15 → 515%.

   Interpretation: The pooled arrangement and capital support materially increase the RBC ratio from 300% to about 515%, indicating stronger capital adequacy. On many exams you can say this moves the insurer from a strong to a very strong capital position. Note: exact regulatory action thresholds vary, but higher RBC ratios reduce the likelihood of supervisory actions and support higher ratings.

2. Q12 (15 min): Stress test scenario—if a 1-in-50 catastrophic event reduces surplus by $60 million net of reinsurance, compute the post-event surplus and RBC ratio. Discuss rating implications.

   Answer:

   1. Post-event surplus = 170 - 60 = $110 million.
   2. RBC ratio post-event = 110 / 33 ≈ 3.33 → 333%.

   Interpretation: Even after a significant catastrophe, the insurer’s RBC ratio remains substantially above typical watch levels, reflecting good resilience. In a ratings context, AM Best would consider the frequency and severity of such events, reinsurance recoverables, and the insurer’s plan to replenish capital when assessing rating stability.

3. Q13 (15 min): Qualitative exam-style question—what governance actions should Michigan Millers document to convince a rating agency that the pool membership will be a sustained benefit?

   Answer (key points you should list in an exam):

   • Formal capital support agreements (written, legally binding) with clear triggers.
   • Documentation of reinsurance pricing and terms, plus counterparty credit assessments.
   • Integrated ERM framework demonstrating stress testing across pool scenarios.
   • Board-level oversight and contingency capital plans.
   • Transparency on surplus flows and governance of pooled assets/liabilities.

   These items show sustained, credible support rather than one-off assistance, which underpins long-term ratings.

How to use this drill in your licensing prep (actionable study steps)

1. Time yourself precisely: simulate exam conditions for each set (15, 30, 45 minutes).
2. Write out calculations and underline key phrases in rating rationales during practice—explain them in one sentence each.
3. Create a two‑column cheat-sheet: left column = rating drivers (balance sheet, reinsurance, ERM); right column = metrics (surplus, combined ratio, RBC).
4. Practice translating press-release language to exam facts: e.g., "ratings extended" → look for capital/support evidence in the vignette.
5. After each timed drill, spend equal time reviewing explanations and correcting mistakes—this is where learning compounds.

2026 Trends that change how you should study credit ratings and solvency

Stay current—exam content increasingly reflects real-world, 2026 developments:

• Ratings agencies now integrate climate and cyber scenarios into credit assessments. Expect exam vignettes that ask you to weigh emerging risks against capital buffers.
• Dynamic capital modeling and AI-driven stress tests are more common in rating rationales. Be comfortable with scenario logic rather than only static ratios.
• Pooling and alternative capital (including reinsurance pools and internal capture vehicles) are role players—understand how affiliation codes and contractual support change net exposures.
• Regulatory focus on group supervision means ratings often reflect group-level support; exam scenarios will test whether you identify parent vs. subsidiary risk.
• Proctoring and exam delivery innovations: more timed, adaptive items that ask for short written explanations—not just MCQs. Practice clear, concise rationales.

Common exam traps — and how to avoid them

• Trap: Equating higher premium volume with stronger ratings. Fix: Always ask how volume affects profitability and risk concentration.
• Trap: Ignoring affiliation codes. Fix: Memorize common codes and practice their net-risk implications.
• Trap: Treating outlook changes as permanent. Fix: Learn agency outlook semantics: positive, stable, negative.
• Trap: Doing math mentally under time pressure. Fix: practice step-by-step written calculations for RBC and combined ratios.

“For exam success, don’t just read the rating headline—translate the headline into balance-sheet, reinsurance, and ERM evidence.”

Final takeaways

The Michigan Millers upgrade is a compact, high-value scenario for insurance licensing preparation: it ties together credit ratings, capital adequacy, reinsurance/pooling, and ERM. Use the timed drills above to build speed and analytical depth. In 2026, exam questions will reward candidates who link agency language to numeric metrics and governance evidence.

Call to action

Ready to convert learning into scores? Run this Michigan Millers drill in a full timed mock on onlinetest.pro to track your heat-map weaknesses and get instant, actionable feedback. Join our 2026 licensing prep bundle for targeted practice on AM Best-style rating scenarios, RBC calculations, and pool-affiliation case studies.

Related Reading

• From Meme to Series: How Publishers Can Turn Cultural Moments Like ‘Very Chinese Time’ Into Evergreen Content
• Hytale Resource Farming Routes: Darkwood, Lightwood, and Endgame Materials
• Ethical Sourcing Spotlight: Brands That Protect Moderators and Workers
• How Proposed Auto Industry Laws Like the SELF DRIVE Act Could Change Auto‑Related Tax Incentives
• What Beauty Brands Should Know About Cashtags and Social Stock Talk